← Search

Mikhail Young

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Union City, GA
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
21 matches · 18W–3L · seasons 2018–2023
Match history21 matches
W
2023-10-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeannine Pelham-Young mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-5
W
Christie Chen / Jose Gonzalez
2023-09-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeannine Pelham-Young mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2022-10-28 · Sugar Creek (Karen Webb-Smith)* · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Webb-Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
2022-10-14 · Sugar Creek (Karen Webb-Smith)* · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Head mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-5
W
2022-10-07 · Sugar Creek (Karen Webb-Smith)* · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Webb-Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
W
2022-09-30 · Sugar Creek (Karen Webb-Smith)* · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeannine Pelham-Young mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
W
2022-09-23 · Sugar Creek (Karen Webb-Smith)* · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Webb-Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2022-09-16 · Sugar Creek (Karen Webb-Smith)* · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeannine Pelham-Young mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2022-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Webb-Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2022-04-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeannine Pelham-Young mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2022-03-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Webb-Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2022-03-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with LaTanya Davis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
93.3%
14W–1L · 63.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
7 matches
#1 Singles
14%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert