← Search

Matthew Becker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hatfield, PA
3.0A year-end 2024
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
21 matches · 8W–13L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history21 matches
L
2024-10-19 · Upper Dubliners · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Weckerly mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-09-21 · Upper Dubliners · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Weckerly mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Weckerly mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-01-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Weckerly mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-01-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Weckerly mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
L
2023-12-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Weckerly mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-11-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Weckerly mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2020-09-07 · Becker/Weckerly · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Brenda Weckerly mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2020-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Shields mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2020-02-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julia Raizen mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
Dutch Schwertner / Nancy Schwertner
2020-01-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Uhle mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2019-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Shields mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
36.8%
7W–12L · 42.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert