← Search

Alejandrina Herrera Fey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Birmingham, AL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
533 matches · 379W–154L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history533 matches
W
2026-10-23 · BHRC - Ernest 40 Fall 2027 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Kimel
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-10-17 · Hoover Met - Shirley/Fehr · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Kimel
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-16 · BHRC - Ernest 40 Fall 2027 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andie Mango
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-09-26 · Hoover Met - Shirley/Fehr · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Mills
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-18 · BHRC - Ernest 40 Fall 2027 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Payne
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-04 · BHRC - Ernest 40 Fall 2027 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Shephard
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · BH - Duck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kerri Owens
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Kimel championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzette Pflaum championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · PRC - Duck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Bolt
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · PRC - Duck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Bolt
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · PRC - Duck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzette Pflaum
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams185 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 66.9% of games
3.5
78.3%
90W–25L · 60.4% of games
4.0
62.2%
140W–85L · 54.2% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
78.3%
18W–5L · 64.6% of games
7.5
75.5%
37W–12L · 62.7% of games
8.5
78.3%
36W–10L · 57.4% of games
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 75% of games
7.0mixed
88.9%
24W–3L · 64.5% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
22W–11L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
199 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
172 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
144 matches
#2 Singles
2%
11 matches
#1 Singles
1%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova