← Search

Keri Gauldin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baton Rouge, LA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
228 matches · 136W–92L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history228 matches
L
2026-10-21 · Westerfield/18/4.0/WD/BREC · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Kati Williamson
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-10-07 · Westerfield/18/4.0/WD/BREC · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Kati Williamson
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-28 · Frederick/40/7.5/CWN/BREC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sydney Braud
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-21 · Frederick/40/7.5/CWN/BREC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sydney Braud
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-17 · Gauldin/18/7.5/CWD/BREC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Frederick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-09 · Westerfield/18/4.0/WD/BREC · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Kati Williamson
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-03 · Frederick/40/7.5/CWN/BREC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kitzia Bordlee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · Westerfield/18/4.0/WD/BREC · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Kati Williamson
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · Frederick/40/7.5/CWN/BREC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sydney Braud
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-28 · Gauldin/18/7.5/CWD/BREC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Holly Bordelon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · Gauldin/18/7.5/CWD/BREC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly Currie
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-27 · Frederick/40/7.5/CWN/BREC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sydney Braud
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams81 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 64.7% of games
3.5
69.7%
23W–10L · 57.8% of games
4.0
52.2%
36W–33L · 50.3% of games
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 70.5% of games
7.5
50.7%
36W–35L · 49.9% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
68.8%
22W–10L · 58.7% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
86 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
55 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#3 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert