← Search

Amy Reed

— year-end
32 matches · 10W–22L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Amy Reed to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
2026-08-27 · RCC - Wilson/Lewis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · RCC - Wilson/Lewis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-24 · RCC - Filippini · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deana Seuferling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-10 · RCC - Filippini · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deana Seuferling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-1
W
2026-07-09 · RCC - Wilson/Lewis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lois Molony
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · Riverchase - Reed · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Poirier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-03 · Riverchase - Reed · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Poirier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-27 · Riverchase - Reed · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Poirier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · Riverchase - Reed · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marianne Herman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-23 · Riverchase - Rodgers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marianne Herman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-09-02 · Riverchase - Rodgers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marianne Herman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-08-21 · Riverchase - Reed · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deana Seuferling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
50%
7W–7L · 48.5% of games
3.5
0%
0W–7L · 32.2% of games
6.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
10 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova