Andrea Skidmore
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LOWELL, MI
162 matches · 101W–61L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history162 matches
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-5
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2024
PA Adams FWL A55-7.0W
PA Adams SSL A55-7.0W
PA Adams SSL A55-7.0W
PA Fiscus FWL A40-4.0W
PA Sanchez-Martin FWL A55-8.0W
PA Vinoski FWL A18-3.5W
PA Applehof FWL A40-3.5W
PA Applehof SSL A40-3.5W
PA Fiscus FWL A40-4.0W
PA Fiscus SSL A40-4.0W
PA Johnson FWL A18-3.5WW
PA Sanchez-Martin FWL A55-8.0W
PA Sanchez-Martin SSL A55-8.0W
PA Vinoski FWL A18-3.5W
PA Vinoski SSL A18-3.5W
PA Applehof SSL A40-3.5W
PA Johnson SSL A18-3.5WW
PA Vinoski SSL A18-3.5W
MVC Sanchez-Martin FWL A55-7.0W
PA Applehof SSL A40-3.5W
PA Beckstrom FWL A40-3.5W
PA Johnson FWL A18-3.5WW
PA Johnson SSL A18-3.5WW
PA Vinoski FWL A18-3.5W
PA Vinoski SSL A18-3.5W
PA Muller FWL A18-3.5WW
PA Muller SSL A18-3.5WW
PA Sanchez-Martin FWL A18-3.5W
PA Sanchez-Martin FWL A40-3.5W
PA Vinoski SSL A18-3.5W
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
67.5%
79W–38L · 57% of games
4.0
50%
6W–6L · 47.5% of games
7.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 55.8% of games
8.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 48.4% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
53 matches
#1 Singles
32%
51 matches
#2 Singles
15%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
17 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.