← Search

Peggy Bryan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
257 matches · 127W–130L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history257 matches
W
2026-10-31 · Raintree Retrievers - Cheek · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Douglas Ayers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-10-24 · Raintree Retrievers - Cheek · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Dau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-18 · Raintree Retrievers - Cheek · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Gibson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-06 · RT Winning Combo - Cheek · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Scott
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-22 · RT Winning Combo - Cheek · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Helen Wang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-09 · RT Winning Combo - Cheek · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Molly Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · RT Winning Combo - Cheek · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rebecca Schwartz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · Bullard - Bryan 55+ · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Boschen
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-26 · Raintree Forty Plus Fab - Cheek · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marina Plaksina-Vaniakin
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · Raintree Forty Plus Fab - Cheek · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marina Plaksina-Vaniakin
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · Raintree Forty Plus Fab - Cheek · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Boschen
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · Raintree Forty Plus Fab - Cheek · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Lyons
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
48.6%
52W–55L · 50.2% of games
3.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 43.8% of games
6.0
61.8%
21W–13L · 53.6% of games
6.5
31.6%
6W–13L · 44.8% of games
7.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 36.1% of games
3.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.1% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
59.5%
25W–17L · 56.4% of games
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 44.2% of games
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 59.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
77 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
62 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
#3 Singles
2%
6 matches
Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer