← Search

Morgan Neal

West Richland, WA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 41W–26L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Morgan Neal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-07-25 · PC-Happy Hour · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stacey Neal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · PC-Happy Hour · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stacey Neal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-17 · PC-Motionally Challenged · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wayne Kohan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · PC-Motionally Challenged · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Barcus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · PC-Motionally Challenged · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wayne Kohan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-16 · PC-Motionally Challenged · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-15 · PC-Motionally Challenged · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Kirkham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2024-11-09 · #1 Doubles · with Stacey Neal championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
CHRISTOPHER DICKASON / Michelle Dickason
2024-11-09 · #3 Doubles · with Stacey Neal championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
Jerry Zhang / Andrea Chu
2024-11-08 · #3 Doubles · with Stacey Neal championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-09-29 · CBRC-Smarter Not Harder · #1 Male Doubles · 8.0 · with Jason Chapman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6
W
2024-09-28 · CBRC-Smarter Not Harder · #2 Mixed Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Tomerlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
69.2%
18W–8L · 57.2% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 47.3% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#1 Male Doubles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert