← Search

Cezanne Garlinghouse

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fayetteville, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
210 matches · 51W–159L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history210 matches
L
2026-06-27 · Larsen/Lowell/PCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pat Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-03 · Larsen/Lowell/PCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brendan Glass mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-26 · Sanders/Rogers/PCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Chronister
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-24 · Sanders/Rogers/PCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marjorie Hanus
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-21 · Fenton-Adair/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · Sanders/Rogers/PCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Larsen
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-19 · Garlinghouse-Adair/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Perez
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-12 · Sanders/Rogers/PCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Young
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-11 · Sanders/Rogers/PCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Young
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-11 · Garlinghouse-Adair/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandy Long
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-09 · Sanders/Rogers/PCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Young
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-06 · Sanders/Rogers/PCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Young
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.75
40%
2W–3L · 41.9% of games
3.0
35.1%
39W–72L · 42.8% of games
3.25
33.3%
3W–6L · 43.2% of games
3.5
7.5%
4W–49L · 24.6% of games
5.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
12.5%
2W–14L · 30.9% of games
3.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 25.6% of games
3.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 24.6% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
49 matches
#2 Singles
19%
40 matches
#1 Singles
11%
23 matches
#3 Singles
10%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer