← Search

Stacy Ezell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Vestavia Hills, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
251 matches · 133W–118L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history251 matches
W
2026-11-02 · West Homewood - Hughes/McDuff · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sally Hoerner
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-28 · West Homewood - Hughes/McDuff · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Lynn Warren
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-10-19 · West Homewood - Hughes/McDuff · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Dwyer
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-10-16 · Highland - Brown · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Kilgore
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-28 · West Homewood - Hughes/McDuff · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenni Falkner
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-25 · Highland - Brown · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Bee Currie
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-14 · West Homewood - Hughes/McDuff · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Dwyer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-04 · Highland - Brown · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Brown
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-20 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Stewart · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leslie Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-19 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Stewart · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maria Seoane
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-12 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Stewart · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Gray
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Stewart · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alison Huang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
60.9%
78W–50L · 53.4% of games
3.5
40%
22W–33L · 45.3% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
27W–27L · 51.2% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 53% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 34.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
69 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova