← Search

Patrick Miranda

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Brevard, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 41W–34L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history75 matches
L
2026-09-26 · WNCD Hartsock (BHRC) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bradley Rising
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · WNCM Shanor (Brevard) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bennett Miller
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-14 · WNCD Hartsock (BHRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joel Sawyer
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-06 · WNCM Shanor (Brevard) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Frady
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-30 · WNCD Hartsock (BHRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Hartsock
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-22 · WNCM Shanor (Brevard) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Snowdon
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-16 · WNCD Hartsock (BHRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with William Mcgee
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-02 · WNCD Hartsock (BHRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Murray
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-26 · WNCD Hartsock (BHRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joel Sawyer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-07-14 · WNCJ Jackson (BHRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shari Rawet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-07-01 · WNCA Thompson (BHRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Burton
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-06-24 · WNCA Thompson (BHRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miles Schafer
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
51.4%
19W–18L · 50.1% of games
4.5
80%
4W–1L · 62.5% of games
7.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.9% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 60% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer