← Search

Charlene Deroche

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
North Reading, MA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 54W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history94 matches
L
2026-07-28 · SFT:Spark Blue:Deroche/Shanahan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elaine Faria
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · SFT:Spark-A: Green:Sideman/Sideman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chryssa O'Connor
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · SFT:Spark Blue:Deroche/Shanahan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine Schmitt
loading the estimate
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · SFT:Spark-A: Green:Sideman/Sideman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chryssa O'Connor
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-16 · SFT:Spark Blue:Deroche/Shanahan · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine Schmitt
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · SFTSpark-A:Green:Sideman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Danforth
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · SFT:Spark Blue:Deroche/Shanahan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine Schmitt
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · SFT:Spark Blue:Deroche/Shanahan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Hocking
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-27 · SFTSpark-A:Green:Sideman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Knizewski
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-26 · SFT:Spark Blue:Deroche/Shanahan · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anastasia Packard
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-25 · SFT:Spark-A: Green:Sideman/Sideman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elaine Faria
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-18 · SFT:Spark-A: Green:Sideman/Sideman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Gendron
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
62.3%
38W–23L · 53.6% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 49.6% of games
6.0
48%
12W–13L · 50.2% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
25 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal