← Search

Tom Saltzer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
334 matches · 154W–180L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history334 matches
L
2026-06-20 · Hempfield Fireballers - Baumer · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Kelly
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-02 · Hempfield String Theory 40+ - Roeder · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Roeder
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-31 · LTYC - Stauffer/Stover · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victor Kong
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
William Loercher / Charles Smuck
2026-05-31 · Hempfield Fireballers - Baumer · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dudley Rowe
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-28 · Hempfield - Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Vanvalkenburgh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
Default
2026-03-08 · Hempfield - Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Shaak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-13 · Hempfield Fireballs - Baumer · #1 Doubles · with Amber Kroh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-08 · Hempfield - Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Shaak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-11-23 · Hempfield - Stauffer / Stover · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katherine Deisley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
Jorge Kareh / Edgar Borrego
2025-11-07 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gregory de Vitry championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-02 · Hempfield - Stauffer / Stover · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Loose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-11-01 · Hempfield - Baumer Tri · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Bowen
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams89 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 65.8% of games
3.5
49.1%
27W–28L · 50% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
61.7%
37W–23L · 55.7% of games
7.0
43.2%
16W–21L · 48% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
40%
8W–12L · 41.7% of games
6.0mixed
63.9%
23W–13L · 54.1% of games
7.0mixed
40%
30W–45L · 46.3% of games
8.0mixed
20.7%
6W–23L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
143 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
120 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
64 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe