← Search

Kimberly Geske

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Scottsdale, AZ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 10W–28L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history38 matches
L
2026-09-27 · IE-Bear Creek-Haggerty · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-29 · IE-Bear Creek-Haggerty · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · IE-Bear Creek-Haggerty · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Bailey-Sease
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-07 · IE-Bear Creek-Bella Chicas-Haggerty · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-01-17 · IE-Bear Creek-Bella Chicas-Haggerty · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-07-03 · IE-Bear Creek-Bella Chicas-Ads-Borresen · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natalie LeBaron
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-05-24 · IE-Bear Creek-Bella Chicas-Ads-Borresen · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Bailey-Sease
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-17 · IE-Bear Creek-Bella Chicas-Ads-Borresen · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natalie LeBaron
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-05-03 · IE-Bear Creek-Bella Chicas-Ads-Borresen · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Osland
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-04-26 · IE-Bear Creek-Bella Chicas-Ads-Borresen · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natalie LeBaron
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-03-23 · IE-Bear Creek-Bella Chicas-Haggerty · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Leonard
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-03-15 · IE-Bear Creek-Bella Chicas-Haggerty · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vonadale Silva
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
30.4%
7W–16L · 43.5% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 26.8% of games
6.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer