← Search

Cheryl Poisson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pawtucket, RI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 14W–41L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history55 matches
L
2026-10-24 · A CC: Countesses/McKinney/Radlein · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Radlein
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-26 · CC: Howes · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy D'Amelio
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-25 · CC: Howes · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy D'Amelio
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-17 · CC: McVay · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Noelle Vitt
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-08-13 · CC: Howes · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Noelle Vitt
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · CC: McVay · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Collins
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · CC: McVay · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Noelle Vitt
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-19 · CC: McVay · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gabriella Della Corte
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 5-0
W
2026-06-25 · CC: McVay · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacqueline McKinney
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-16 · CC: McVay · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Morrone
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-08-11 · STG: Slice Girls/Mendoza · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Lewis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 0-6
L
2025-08-07 · CC: Howes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Noelle Vitt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
14.8%
4W–23L · 40.4% of games
6.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.5% of games
7.0
10%
1W–9L · 36.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams