← Search

Anne Esquivel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bolingbrook, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 24W–15L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history39 matches
L
2026-10-25 · NITA E 35W18a Challenge-Burk · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Rubach
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-10-18 · NITA F 65CWd Challenge-Rossi/Abbott · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sylvie Rossi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-11 · NITA E 35W18a Challenge-Burk · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Rubach
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-09-20 · NITA F 65CWd Challenge-Rossi/Abbott · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ally Bachmann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-11-16 · NITA E 35W40f Challenge-Rossi/Kennedy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Schick
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-08 · NITA E 35W40f Challenge-Rossi/Kennedy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Ambutas
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-10-18 · NITA E 35W40f Challenge-Rossi/Kennedy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Ambutas
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-09-06 · NITA E 35W40f Challenge-Rossi/Kennedy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with LeeAnn James
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-5
L
2025-07-17 · NITA S 35W18a Challenge-Rossi · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky Sharp
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
L
2025-07-02 · NITA S 35W18a Challenge-Rossi · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Schick
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-4, 0-1
L
2025-06-27 · NITA S 35W18a Challenge-Rossi · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Schick
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-5
L
2025-06-25 · NITA S 35W18a Challenge-Rossi · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Wasylenko
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
59.4%
19W–13L · 54.6% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer