← Search

Jay Penn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tulsa, OK
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
310 matches · 217W–93L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history310 matches
W
2026-10-27 · Jackson/PH/40&over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Gore
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-19 · Jackson/PH/40&over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Henry
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-06 · Jackson/PH/40&over4.0M · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Jackson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-01 · Jackson/PH/40&over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Hjelm
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-23 · Jackson/PH/40&over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Hjelm
loading the estimate
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · Penn 55s 7.0/PH · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginger Penn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-16 · Penn 55s 7.0/PH · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginger Penn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-07 · Penn 55s 7.0/PH · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginger Penn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-26 · Penn 55s 7.0/PH · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginger Penn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Baugher/PH 18s 7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginger Penn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-22 · Baugher/PH 18s 7.0X · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginger Penn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · Jackson/PH/4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Bright
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 62.4% of games
3.0
92.9%
39W–3L · 71.8% of games
3.5
74.6%
53W–18L · 61.2% of games
4.0
45.7%
21W–25L · 50.6% of games
7.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 58.4% of games
8.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 49.5% of games
5.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
68%
17W–8L · 57.9% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
38W–19L · 56.3% of games
8.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 62.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
104 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
77 matches
#1 Singles
11%
33 matches
#2 Singles
4%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer