← Search

Kim Rasmussen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Salinas, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 57W–47L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history104 matches
L
2026-04-28 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.0A-DT · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam Kirkendall championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-25 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.0A-DT · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam Kirkendall championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-03-12 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.0A-DT · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam Kirkendall
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-27 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.0A-DT · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam Kirkendall
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-02-14 · CHAMISAL TC 18MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Lin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-04 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.0A-DT · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Scholink
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-01-31 · CHAMISAL TC 18MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Lin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-15 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.0A-DT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam Kirkendall
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-03-08 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Asuman Johnson
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-02-22 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly McGee
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-02-07 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly McGee
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-01-11 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Mondragon
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 42.4% of games
4.0
51.5%
34W–32L · 49.2% of games
7.5
100%
6W–0L · 59.6% of games
8.5
60%
12W–8L · 47.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
11 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert