← Search

Tara Cooper

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Stevens Point, WI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 62W–55L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history117 matches
W
2026-09-30 · WI Adult Combo 7.5 Women Goerke Davison · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karlyn Jakusz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-09-23 · WI Adult Combo 7.5 Women Goerke Davison · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karlyn Jakusz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-09-08 · WI Adult Combo 7.5 Women Goerke Davison · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leah Hollander
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · WI Adult Combo 7.5 Women Goerke Davison · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karlyn Jakusz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · WI Adult Combo 7.5 Women Goerke Davison · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nichole Matowitz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · WI Tri-Level Low Women NCL Cooper · #2 Doubles · with Meghan Busa
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · WI Tri-Level Low Women NCL Cooper · #2 Doubles · with Meghan Busa
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-25 · WI Tri-Level Low Women NCL Cooper · #2 Doubles · with Kelly Shippy
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-10 · 2025 WI Combo 7.5X NEL travel Jakusz · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gary Congdon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-01-10 · 2025 WI Combo 7.5X NEL travel Jakusz · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gary Congdon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-01-09 · 2025 WI Combo 7.5W NEL travel Jakusz · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leah Herdrich
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-01-09 · 2025 WI Combo 7.5W NEL travel Jakusz · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leah Herdrich
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
76%
19W–6L · 62.9% of games
4.0
20%
4W–16L · 40.2% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
76.9%
20W–6L · 57.5% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.8% of games
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.9% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
32 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams