← Search

Amy Halliday

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rochester, MN
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
15 matches · 6W–9L · seasons 2021–2022
Match history15 matches
L
2022-03-06 · Farr Singh 8.0 RTC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alan Orthaus mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2022-02-20 · Farr Singh 8.0 RTC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ajay Singh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2022-01-16 · Farr Singh 8.0 RTC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alan Orthaus mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-01-02 · Farr Singh 8.0 RTC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ajay Singh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2021-04-18 · Singh / McKenzie RAC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Samuel Prabhakar mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
2021-04-11 · Singh / McKenzie RAC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anish Singh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2021-03-21 · Singh / McKenzie RAC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ajay Singh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2021-03-14 · Singh / McKenzie RAC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shounak Majumder mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2020-03-08 · RTC Jenson Don’t Call it a Comeback · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Jenson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 5-5
W
2020-03-01 · RTC Jenson Don’t Call it a Comeback · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alan Orthaus mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
L
2020-02-23 · RTC Jenson Don’t Call it a Comeback · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Jenson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2020-02-16 · RTC Jenson Don’t Call it a Comeback · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alan Orthaus mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2020–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 67% of the time
#3 Doubles
67%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe