← Search

Karen Omholt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Anselmo, CA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 27W–12L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history39 matches
W
2026-10-17 · MARIN TC 55MX8.0B · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vincent Mar mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-10-11 · MARIN TC 55MX8.0B · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vincent Mar mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-27 · MARIN TC 55MX8.0B · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Merron mixed
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-09-19 · MARIN TC 55MX8.0B · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Merron mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-07-13 · MT TAM RC 40MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jason Camp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-26 · MT TAM RC 40MX8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Key mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-04-24 · MT TAM RC 55AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Benz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-03-22 · MT TAM RC 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Benz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-05-19 · MT TAM RC 55AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanie Costamagna
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-05-11 · MT TAM RC 55AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Benz
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-04-28 · MT TAM RC 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Benz
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-02-25 · MT TAM RC 40AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Benz
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 53.3% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 60.9% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#1 Singles
8%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert