Search

Heidi Hollyhead

NEW CANAAN, CT
3.5C year-end 2025
139 matches · 70W–69L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.04
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
33%
down to 3.0
67%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 19% down · 81% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.07. Higher than today’s 3.04 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Heidi has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Heidi has gone from the 53rd to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
56.1%
46W–36L · 51.4% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 52.1% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
36%
9W–16L · 48.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history139 matches
W
Michelle Fisher / Lauren Mattson
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Oana Root
+0.041better than expected — took 62% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Renee Cohen / Tulika Khemani
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Grund
+0.015about as expected — took 47% of games against 43% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Robyn Painting / Siri Kloud
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Rabin
0.048below expectation — took 14% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Samara Graca / Rovena Juman
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Foley
0.022below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Shari Matusow / Karen Rothenberg
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Borcherding
0.066below expectation — took 8% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Kristen Zallo / Irina ARGESEANU
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Moore
+0.047better than expected — took 48% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 5-6
L
Ashley Smith / Jennifer Helgesen
2026-03-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Walbridge
0.034below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Caryn Silverman / Danielle Powers
2026-03-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Slater
0.058below expectation — took 14% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Maggi Maksoud / Michele Bond
2026-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Kerr
0.041below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Patricia DiSanto / Carin Pai
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Mae Alandy
+0.044better than expected — took 50% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Yuka Endo / Elizabeth Toussi
2026-03-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Eldredge
0.062below expectation — took 14% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Dina Weinstein / Nicole Berman
2026-02-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yang Chen
0.002about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.