← Search

Jennifer Edney

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Brevard, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 78W–63L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history141 matches
L
2026-10-11 · WNCA Murray (Brevard) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Casey Blair
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-04 · WNCA Murray (Brevard) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susanna Saidi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-20 · WNCA Murray (Brevard) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Casey Blair
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-30 · WNCA Murray (Brevard) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alaine LeGrand
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-16 · WNCA Murray (Brevard) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alaine LeGrand
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-20 · WNCD Hartsock (BHRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Shanor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-13 · WNCA Murray (Brevard) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Eccles Thompson
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-12 · WNCA Murray (Brevard) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandra Murray
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-29 · WNCA Murray (Brevard) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Eccles Thompson
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-15 · WNCA Murray (Brevard) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Eccles Thompson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-08 · WNCA Murray (Brevard) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandra Murray
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-09-30 · WNCV Gibson (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deborah James
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
66.7%
38W–19L · 54.9% of games
4.0
40%
10W–15L · 45.1% of games
6.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.2% of games
7.5
37%
10W–17L · 47.5% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.3% of games
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 68.4% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
32 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert