Search

Emma Gerken

year-end
43 matches · 27W–16L · seasons 20242026

Captains: add Emma Gerken to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-08-12 · Wickertree 1 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kate McAlister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · Wickertree 1 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kate McAlister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Beth Wicker / Jessica Kittrell
2026-07-22 · Wickertree 1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Moricca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Wickertree 1 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Pawlarczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-2
L
Mary McGuff / Ashley Graber
2026-06-17 · Wickertree 1 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kate McAlister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
Sabina Jenkins / Denise Flowers
2026-06-10 · Wickertree 1 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kate McAlister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-03 · Wickertree 1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deidra Kellogg-Okoye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · New Albany 2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-04-19 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Pawlarczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Sharon May
2026-04-19 · New Albany 2 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-12 · Wickertree 2 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-12 · New Albany 2 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams10 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
64%
16W–9L · 54.3% of games
4.0
60%
6W–4L · 49.5% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova