← Search

H Jun Lee

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mountain View, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 9W–3L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history12 matches
W
2025-12-09 · FOOTHILLS TandS S70M8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Gray
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-09 · FOOTHILLS TandS S70M8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with B Pearson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-04-10 · UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 65AM8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Kieschnick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-04-02 · UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 65AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ron Pruzan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-03-26 · UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 65AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ron Pruzan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-03-20 · UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 65AM8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Kieschnick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-03-21 · FOOTHILLS TandS 65AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Kline
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-02-22 · FOOTHILLS TandS 65AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Rubas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2022-03-25 · FOOTHILLS TandS 65AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jack Myers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
Kevin Tierney / Chuck White
2022-03-10 · FOOTHILLS TandS 65AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jack Myers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2022-02-25 · FOOTHILLS TandS 65AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jack Myers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2022-02-10 · FOOTHILLS TandS 65AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jack Myers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
75%
9W–3L · 60.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams