← Search

John Hogan

— year-end
34 matches · 28W–6L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add John Hogan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
Tim Davis / Scott Stanton
2026-08-17 · Fulton, Bradley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Don Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
Tim Davis / Scott Stanton
2026-08-16 · Fulton, Bradley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jay Hutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-10 · Fulton, Bradley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Don Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-15 · Fulton, Bradley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bradley Fulton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · Fulton, Bradley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Benefield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-03-27 · Howell, Bryan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2025-03-03 · Howell, Bryan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-02-27 · Howell, Bryan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Covington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-02-17 · Howell, Bryan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Stubbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-07-17 · Fulton, Bradley · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nick Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
Tam Nguyen / Conner Fudge
2024-07-10 · Fulton, Bradley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anthony Covington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-06-26 · Fulton, Bradley · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Daniel Benefield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams9 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 61.6% of games
3.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 62.5% of games
3.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 66.5% of games
4.0
75%
3W–1L · 61.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer