← Search

Jana Conigliaro

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Market, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
424 matches · 274W–150L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history424 matches
L
2026-10-31 · Thonphok - Thongphok40+8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Juan Jose Tijero mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-31 · Thonphok - Thongphok40+8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Juan Jose Tijero mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-31 · Thonphok - Thongphok40+8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Juan Jose Tijero mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-28 · Pietryka - PieCombo 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Vicki Williamson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-27 · Koch · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mason Kiefer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-10-17 · Dickerson Mixed Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Burks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-15 · Pagendarm · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maunette Makowski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-10-13 · Pagendarm · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meredith Leader
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-10-10 · Dickerson Mixed Tri Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Burks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-08 · Pagendarm · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meredith Leader
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-06 · Pagendarm · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meredith Leader
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-28 · Thonphok - Thongphok40+8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Anzures mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams91 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
0.0
76.5%
39W–12L · 58.9% of games
4.0
73.5%
136W–49L · 57.4% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 48.3% of games
7.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 52.7% of games
8.0
50%
3W–3L · 52.7% of games
8.5
75%
6W–2L · 55.3% of games
0.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 49.5% of games
4.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 52.8% of games
4.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 51.5% of games
7.5mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 65.2% of games
8.0mixed
50%
30W–30L · 50% of games
8.5mixed
48.7%
19W–20L · 47.1% of games
9.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
194 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
147 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
70 matches
#1 Singles
2%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer