← Search

Cathy Blankenship

Thompsons Station, TN
3.0C year-end 2024
93 matches · 37W–56L · seasons 2020–2024
Where Cathy sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Cathy is one of 1349 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 32% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cathy has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

2.02.53.020202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Cathy has gone from the 59th to the 61st percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
68%
17W–8L · 58.6% of games
3.0
30.2%
13W–30L · 41.1% of games
6.0mixed
27.3%
6W–16L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history93 matches
W
Angela Patterson / Anna Stock
2024-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Wendy Walker
−0.043below expectation — took 54% of games against 69% expected
7-5, 6-6
W
Manuela Crowley / Heidi Carlson
2024-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Wendy Walker
−0.007about as expected — took 60% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Lisa Mihm / Chris Koehlermixed
2024-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bryan Heathman
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Carrie Barrios / Jillayna Campos
2024-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Wendy Walker
−0.018below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Delyse Dickinson / Philip Mobergmixed
2024-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jason Messer
+0.000better than expected — took 41% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2024-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bryan Heathman
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2024-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mamta Pandey
+0.004about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
Sheri Blumenthal / Jung Lee
2024-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Meng Yang
+0.012better than expected — took 86% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Lindsay Goode / Brandy Nordstrom
2024-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elisha Logue
−0.043below expectation — took 37% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eloisa Tang
−0.006below expectation — took 28% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
Farinaz Shokrani / Chia Yang
2024-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Eloisa Tang
−0.037below expectation — took 65% of games against 73% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Melissa Jamison
2024-04-22 · #1 Singles · 2.5
+0.013better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.