← Search

Jarod Carl

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ames, IA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 6W–12L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history18 matches
L
2025-04-19 · Johnson & Almquist: Ames Fitness · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Nordhoff
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-04-05 · Johnson & Almquist: Ames Fitness · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Hubbard
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-03-08 · Johnson & Almquist: Ames Fitness · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Stites
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-04-27 · Johnson: Ames · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Hanson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-03-30 · Johnson: Ames · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kurt Kinnevan
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2024-02-17 · Johnson: Ames · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kurt Kinnevan
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-01-20 · Johnson: Ames · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Hubbard
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2022-10-23 · Carl · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Kinnevan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2022-10-09 · Carl · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Kinnevan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-10-02 · Carl · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Carl mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2022-04-24 · Carl · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Harbert mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
L
2022-02-13 · Carl · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Harbert mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
30%
3W–7L · 44.7% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 56% of the time
#2 Doubles
56%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
1 match
#2 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams