← Search

Douglas Schmalz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indian Wells, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 3W–24L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history27 matches
L
2025-02-03 · CV-Toscana CC/Icke · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Cassell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-01-27 · CV-Toscana CC/Icke · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Cassell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-20 · CV-Toscana CC/Icke · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Carlson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-06 · CV-Toscana CC/Icke · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with J Michael Naughton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
W
2024-03-04 · CV-Toscana CC/Schmalz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Luke Breton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-4
L
2024-02-19 · CV-Toscana CC/Schmalz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Luke Breton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2024-01-27 · CV-Toscana CC/Tessler · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Bratlien mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-25 · CV-Toscana CC/Schmalz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Bertsch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
W
2024-01-23 · CV-Toscana CC/Tessler · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with JANELL TESSLER mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-01-13 · CV-Toscana CC/Tessler · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Heck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-03-27 · CV-Toscana/Sturdyvin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with PETER ASHBY
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
L
2023-01-09 · CV-Toscana/Sturdyvin · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Ramsey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
4.8%
1W–20L · 23.9% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 39.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova