← Search

Cindy Apgar

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Johns Creek, GA
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
6 matches · 1W–5L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history6 matches
L
2026-03-27 · Oxford Mill (Nicole Schreck)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Thomas mixed
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-17 · Oxford Mill (Nicole Schreck)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Apgar mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-10-03 · Oxford Mill (Nicole Schreck)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Apgar mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-09-19 · Oxford Mill (Nicole Schreck)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Panome Thepmanivong mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Apgar mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-03-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Apgar mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
3.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert