← Search

Debie Marsden

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sherman Oaks, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
258 matches · 144W–114L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history258 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Toluca Lake Swans/Marsden/Toluca · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nickie Huai
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-25 · Toluca Lake Swans/Marsden/Toluca · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karin Hoesli
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-10-24 · Toluca Lake Swans/Huai/Toluca Lake · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Lawler
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-09-26 · Toluca Lake Swans/Huai/Toluca Lake · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lena Bouton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-20 · Toluca Lake Team Tempest/Berman-Aladjem/Toluca · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenji Thielstrom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-19 · Toluca Lake Swans/Marsden/Toluca · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aubrey Karr
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-13 · Toluca Lake Team Tempest/Berman-Aladjem/Toluca · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gonzalo Suarez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-12 · Toluca Lake Swans/Marsden/Toluca · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen Plummer
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-06 · SFV LLW Glendale Gal-lerias/McCusker-Vidal/Fremont · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Chand championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-09-05 · SFV LLW Glendale Gal-lerias/McCusker-Vidal/Fremont · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Georgia Cano championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
Default
2026-08-09 · Toluca Lake Swans/Higgs/Toluca · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Yu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-07-25 · Toluca Lake Swans/Higgs/Toluca · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aubrey Karr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 43.8% of games
4.0
59.4%
120W–82L · 52.2% of games
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 35.3% of games
8.0
65.2%
15W–8L · 55.2% of games
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
113 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
44 matches
#1 Singles
7%
18 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer