← Search

Christopher Bricker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 60W–94L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history154 matches
L
2026-10-01 · Ph.Gugliotta40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Walton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-30 · Sh.Lav55C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Edward Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-28 · Ph.Gugliotta40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Walton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-24 · Ph.Gugliotta40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Edward Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-19 · Sh.Lav55C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tim Driscoll
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-12 · Sh.Lav55C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Hoomani
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-05 · Sh.Lav55C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eric Moritz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-05-18 · Ph.Gugliotta40A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Coblentz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-07 · Ch.Bricker55A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Driscoll
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-31 · Ch.Bricker55A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Myers
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-03-23 · Ph.Gugliotta40A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Marconi
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-17 · Ch.Bricker55A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Rabby
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
40.6%
28W–41L · 46.7% of games
4.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 30.4% of games
6.5
45.2%
14W–17L · 49.6% of games
7.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.6% of games
3.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 56.7% of games
4.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 40.8% of games
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 41.9% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 36.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
21 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe