← Search

Laura Beber

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greenwich, CT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
299 matches · 166W–133L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history299 matches
L
2026-10-14 · Armonk Tennis Club: Aces 3.0 Fall · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Kaplan
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-09-16 · Armonk Tennis Club: Aces 3.0 Fall · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Kaplan
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-11 · ATC Acing Gracefully 55+ 6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alicia Cintron championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-30 · ATC Acing Gracefully 55+ 6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Felisse Starker
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · ATC Acing Gracefully 55+ 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maria Pedersen
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-22 · ATC Acing Gracefully 55+ 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Angelika Leissl
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · ATC Acing Gracefully 55+ 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Felisse Starker
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · ATC Acing Gracefully 55+ 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maria Pedersen
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-16 · Armonk Tennis: Aces Wild 40+ 3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Kozak
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-05-26 · Armonk Tennis: Aces Wild 40+ 3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alicia Cintron
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-18 · Coveleigh Club 55+ 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Murphy
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-05 · Armonk Tennis: Aces Wild 40+ 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mila Burns
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
61.4%
86W–54L · 54.2% of games
3.5
34.6%
18W–34L · 43.7% of games
6.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 51% of games
7.0
63.6%
21W–12L · 53.1% of games
6.0mixed
64.5%
20W–11L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
46.7%
14W–16L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
115 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
89 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova