← Search

Masako Murphy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Grasonville, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
324 matches · 166W–158L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history324 matches
W
2026-10-19 · Ravekes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindee Smith
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
Default
2026-10-18 · The Vicious Vollies · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Freeman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-15 · Ravekes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Worthington
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-28 · Ravekes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Worthington
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-28 · The Vicious Vollies · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Johnson mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-09-28 · The Vicious Vollies · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Johnson mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · The Vicious Vollies · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Johnson mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-09-08 · Ravekes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Worthington
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-03 · Martin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Mexcur
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-29 · Martin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bari Abensohn
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · Martin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Mexcur
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-23 · Martin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Hopkin
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams77 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
54.3%
69W–58L · 51.9% of games
4.0
29%
9W–22L · 38.3% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 43.8% of games
7.0
62.3%
43W–26L · 55.2% of games
7.5
44.8%
13W–16L · 47.8% of games
8.0
39%
16W–25L · 44.8% of games
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 51.9% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
110 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
105 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
104 matches
Singles
1%
4 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams