← Search

Stacey Rowland

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cherry Hill, NJ
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 13W–11L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history24 matches
L
2026-03-14 · SOUTH/Mixed, Not Stirred · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hal Weiner mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
Default
2026-03-07 · SOUTH/Mixed, Not Stirred · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hal Weiner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-12-13 · SOUTH/Mixed, Not Stirred · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Lapczynski mixed
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-10-18 · SOUTH/Mixed, Not Stirred · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joe Schickling mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-03-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis Mehigan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis Mehigan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-01-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis Mehigan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis Mehigan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-02-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Landon mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-02-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis Mehigan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
W
2024-01-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis Mehigan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-01-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Lapczynski mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 38.4% of games
7.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 60.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 54% of the time
#3 Doubles
54%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
2 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe