← Search

Sarah Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carmel, IN
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
7 matches · 5W–2L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history7 matches
W
2024-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Karwath
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2023-06-01 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6
W
2022-11-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Garland
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2022-07-20 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
Dominique Camara
2022-06-29 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2019-06-19 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 3.5 W, Eynon (IRC-D) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Wayne
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2019-06-12 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 3.5 W, Eynon (IRC-D) · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 64.8% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 43% of the time
#2 Singles
43%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
1 match
#1 Singles
14%
1 match
#2 Doubles
14%
1 match
#3 Doubles
14%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova