← Search

Jeffrey Garner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cedar Rapids, IA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 9W–52L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history61 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Carstensen/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Koopmann
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-24 · Patten: Elmcrest · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Trovas
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-10-16 · Garner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Novak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-02 · Garner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cassandra Kotek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-19 · Randall & Garner: Elmcrest · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcus Womersley
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Default
2026-03-28 · Randall: Elmcrest · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Odegaard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-06 · Garner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amara Andrews mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · Carstensen/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daryl Patten
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-21 · Randall: Elmcrest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Randall
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-08 · Garner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Novak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-01-31 · IA/Ross/18&Over3.0M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tim Koopmann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-30 · Garner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amara Andrews mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
17.6%
3W–14L · 37.8% of games
4.0
11.1%
2W–16L · 28.6% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0%
0W–6L · 39.3% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 29.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#1 Singles
8%
5 matches
Singles
7%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert