← Search

Kim Earle

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richmond, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
197 matches · 81W–116L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history197 matches
W
Default
2026-08-07 · Bullard - Bryan 55+ · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Erin Lyons
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-31 · Bullard - Bryan 55+ · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Hedish
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-07-29 · Bullard - Bryan 55+ · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joyce Hedish
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-26 · Raintree Forty Plus Fab - Cheek · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joyce Hedish
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-07-25 · Raintree Forty Plus Fab - Cheek · #1 Singles · 3.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-23 · Raintree Forty Plus Fab - Cheek · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Lyons
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-13 · Bullard - Bryan 55+ · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathi Ford
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Raintree Forty Plus Fab - Cheek · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joyce Hedish
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-27 · Raintree Forty Plus Fab - Cheek · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Mathews
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-21 · Raintree Forty Plus Fab - Cheek · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Mathews
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-06-20 · Raintree Forty Plus Fab - Cheek · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathi Ford
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · 1 Raintree Rockets - Cheek · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alex Darragh mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
41.5%
34W–48L · 46.5% of games
3.5
14.3%
3W–18L · 31.3% of games
6.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 55.3% of games
6.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.6% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 21.3% of games
2.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.1% of games
6.0mixed
52.4%
22W–20L · 52% of games
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 63.5% of games
7.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
52 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal