← Search

Beverly Azemar

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Boiling Springs, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 45W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history87 matches
L
2026-08-01 · Hershey Gypsy Fiftys - Brummel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Bray championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · Hershey Gypsy Fiftys - Brummel · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Wauhop
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · Hershey Gypsy Fiftys - Brummel · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Jeffries
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · Hershey Gypsy Fiftys - Brummel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Bray
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
Joanne Hess / Nancy Henry
2025-08-02 · Hershey-Gypsy Fiftys (Brummel) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Stokes championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-21 · Hershey-Gypsy Fiftys (Brummel) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Stokes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-07-12 · Hershey - TITANIUM (McHugh) · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colleen Blackall
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-07-10 · Hershey-Gypsy Fiftys (Brummel) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Stokes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-06-22 · Hershey - TITANIUM (McHugh) · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lucinda McHugh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-06-11 · Hershey - TITANIUM (McHugh) · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maureen Field
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-08 · Hershey - TITANIUM (McHugh) · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colleen Blackall
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-05-20 · Hershey - TITANIUM (McHugh) · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maureen Field
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
58.5%
24W–17L · 53.9% of games
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.7% of games
6.0
72%
18W–7L · 57.7% of games
7.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 41% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
22 matches
#1 Singles
8%
7 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer