← Search

Ryan Fitzpatrick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dearborn Heights, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
212 matches · 76W–136L · seasons 2015–2026
Match history212 matches
W
2026-07-23 · FAC-Fitzpatrick 18s 3.0M F3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Logan Dimitrie
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-02 · FAC-Fitzpatrick 18s 3.0M F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Ranta
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · FAC-Fitzpatrick 18s 3.0M F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Schrupp
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-29 · VTC-Crouson (outside) 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kate Farwell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-05-28 · FAC-Fitzpatrick 18s 3.0M F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tyler Wilkie
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-14 · FAC-Fitzpatrick 18s 3.0M F3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Weiss
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-02-22 · FAC-Crouson LOW TRI MEN F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Harrison Lee
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-02-07 · FAC-Crouson LOW TRI MEN F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Ranta
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-12-06 · 4FAC-Fitzpatrick 30 MEN SINGLES F1 · #2 Singles · 6.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-22 · 3FAC-Fitzpatrick 55 COMBO MEN SEM · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Aaron Werbling
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-11-14 · 3FAC-Fitzpatrick 55 COMBO MEN SEM · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Peter Barta
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-11-01 · 3FAC-Fitzpatrick 55 COMBO MEN SEM · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Patrick Stewart
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
0%
0W–5L · 16.7% of games
3.0
36.6%
26W–45L · 45% of games
3.5
37.5%
15W–25L · 47.1% of games
5.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 55.6% of games
6.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 40.8% of games
6.5
22.2%
6W–21L · 37.8% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
46.2%
12W–14L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
68 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
45 matches
#3 Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams