← Search

Caren Kirchick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Moreland Hills, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
172 matches · 88W–84L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history172 matches
W
2026-11-01 · C 6.5W MV1 Kirchick · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Slovasky
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-10-25 · C 7.5W MV1 Kirchick · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Drenovsky
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-24 · FD 7.0 MV Connell · #1 Female Doubles · 7.0 · with Dongmei Zhang
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-16 · CX 6.5 MV1 Herbruck · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ravi Krishnan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-02 · CX 7.5 MV1 Mixon · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joseph Stimac mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-09-26 · C 6.5W MV1 Kirchick · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Slovasky
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-30 · A40 3.5W MV1 Brady · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Jordan
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-18 · A18 3.5W MV2 Ung · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rita Gilman
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-16 · A40 3.5W MV1 Brady · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Griffith
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · A18 3.5W MV2 Ung · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Yotter
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · A40 3.5W MV1 Brady · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Fioritto
loading the estimate
4-4
W
2026-06-04 · A18 3.5W MV2 Ung · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rita Gilman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams87 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
75%
33W–11L · 61.1% of games
3.5
43.1%
22W–29L · 46.5% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.3% of games
5.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.5% of games
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
54.5%
12W–10L · 53.4% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 53.7% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 47.5% of games
7.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe