← Search

Ronald Rosso

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CHESTERFIELD, MI
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
28 matches · 6W–22L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history28 matches
L
2025-12-07 · 3PEACH-Gaines 7.0 X 55&0 F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Talbot mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-16 · 3PEACH-Gaines 7.0 X 55&0 F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robyn Parrott mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-10-26 · 3PEACH-Gaines 7.0 X 55&0 F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Talbot mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2024-12-08 · 6PEACH-GAINES 70X 55&O SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robyn Parrott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-09-29 · 6PEACH-GAINES 70X 55&O SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Studzinski mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2023-12-10 · 5PEACH-GAINES 7.0 MIXED 55&OVER SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Gaines mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
L
2023-12-03 · 5PEACH-GAINES 7.0 MIXED 55&OVER SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Macko mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2023-11-19 · 5PEACH-GAINES 7.0 MIXED 55&OVER SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Studzinski mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2023-11-12 · 1PEACH-GAINES 8.0 MIXED 55&OVER SEM F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Matsui Knapp mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2023-11-05 · 5PEACH-GAINES 7.0 MIXED 55&OVER SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Sinutko mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-10-29 · 1PEACH-GAINES 8.0 MIXED 55&OVER SEM F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Betty Latosinsky mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-10-22 · 1PEACH-GAINES 8.0 MIXED 55&OVER SEM F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Studzinski mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 48.3% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–8L · 22.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova