← Search

SHIRL MCKINNEY

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
MELISSA, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 43W–27L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history70 matches
L
2026-10-20 · Team 10 High Point/Tucker-Itscovitch W3.5F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with MARNI WISE - ITSCOVITCH
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-10 · High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.0F · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Parr
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
Default
2025-10-03 · High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.0F · #1 Singles · 3.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-09-05 · High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.0F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Parr
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-06-26 · High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Lemaster
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-05-22 · High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Childress
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-15 · High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Childress
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-05-14 · High Point/Searles-Lilley W3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darla Searles
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-02-28 · High Point/Lilley-Childress W3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Key
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-02-07 · High Point/Lilley-Childress W3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandy Palisch
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
L
2025-01-24 · High Point/Lilley-Childress W3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennalee Trammel
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2024-09-27 · High Point/Lilley-Childress W3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sherre Barton
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
61.2%
41W–26L · 55.9% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 60% of the time
#3 Doubles
60%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer