← Search

Victoria Taft

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Princeton, MA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 7W–21L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history28 matches
L
2024-04-21 · NETC:New England TC:Charrette · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Gilson
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-4
L
2024-04-07 · NETC:New England TC:Charrette · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ruth Crowley
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-03-24 · NETC:New England TC:Charrette · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Charrette
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-5, 0-1
W
2022-10-21 · PAX:Paxton;Charrette · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Puffer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-09-09 · PAX:Paxton;Charrette · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Hammond mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2022-04-15 · NETC:New England TC Blue:Foley/Welcom · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Foley mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
W
2022-03-04 · NETC:New England TC Blue:Foley/Welcom · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Puffer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2022-01-15 · PAX:Dream Team:Charrette · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Hammond mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2022-01-07 · NETC:New England TC Blue:Foley/Welcom · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Theo Willemse mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 7-6
W
2021-11-19 · PAX:Dream Team:Charrette · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Hammond mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2021-10-22 · PAX:Dream Team:Charrette · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Hammond mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2021-09-10 · PAX:Dream Team:Charrette · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Hammond mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–4L · 44% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 30% of games
7.0mixed
35%
7W–13L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova