← Search

Regina Work

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
South Dennis, MA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 14W–39L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history53 matches
L
2025-12-13 · MCAC:CourtJesters:Leardi:Brazelton · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Sementa
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-4, 0-1
L
2025-12-04 · MCAC:CourtJesters:Leardi:Brazelton · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Audrey Gandini
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-06 · MCAC:CourtJesters:Leardi:Brazelton · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tina Leardi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 5-4, 0-1
W
2025-10-25 · MCAC:CourtJesters:Leardi:Brazelton · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrea Michaels
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-27 · MCAC:Leardi:Leardi/Brazelton · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Margaret Ekholm
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-22 · MCAC:Leardi:Leardi/Brazelton · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Angela Rutzick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-01-18 · MCAC:Leardi:Leardi/Brazelton · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrea Michaels
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-12-07 · MCAC:Leardi:Leardi/Brazelton · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maureen Metta
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
W
2024-11-14 · MCAC:Leardi:Leardi/Brazelton · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Margaret Ekholm
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-11-07 · MCAC:Leardi:Leardi/Brazelton · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Glannon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-5, 0-1
L
2023-06-07 · MCAC:Harris:Harris/White · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly ORourke
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2022-07-05 · MCAC:Summer XLs:White/Harris · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Sullivan
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 49% of games
3.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 38.9% of games
6.0
30%
3W–7L · 41.4% of games
7.0
16.7%
4W–20L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe