Search

David Zies

Cary, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 19W–4L · seasons 20252026

Captains: add David Zies to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
W
Arvind Gupta
2026-08-16 · MD.Fearrington · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-04 · MD.Fearrington · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-30 · MD.Bostic · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-30 · MD.Bostic · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-22 · MD.Fearrington · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · MD.Bostic · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Sanjeev Dimri / Arvind Gupta
2026-07-09 · MD.Bostic · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Fearrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · MD.Fearrington · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Rui Li / Tianren Zhou
2026-06-18 · MD.Bostic · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · MD.Fearrington · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · MD.Bostic · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-04 · MD.Bostic · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 54.2% of games
4.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova