← Search

Olga Keselman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pleasant Hill, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
228 matches · 118W–110L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history228 matches
L
2026-10-25 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CW6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Choi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-26 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 18AW3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yan Hu
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-24 · DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Zapalac
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-16 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 18AW3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eileen Perry
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-07 · DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Zapalac
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Owens
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Zapalac
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-25 · DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Heather Mehta
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-24 · DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AW6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Zapalac
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-05 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Akel championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-25 · DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AW6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Garrahan
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-12 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AW3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nellie Hill
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
55.6%
60W–48L · 51.8% of games
3.5
0%
0W–12L · 28.9% of games
6.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.9% of games
6.5
44.8%
13W–16L · 47.3% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 51.9% of games
6.0mixed
58%
29W–21L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
103 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
57 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer