← Search

Matt Poulk

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.5M year-end 2024
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
17 matches · 7W–10L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history17 matches
L
2026-07-12 · Lo.Jensen18M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daphne Poulk mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-01 · Lo.Jensen18M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daphne Poulk mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-07-18 · Me.Everitt18M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daphne Poulk mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-07-13 · Me.Everitt18M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daphne Poulk mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-08 · Me.Everitt18M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daphne Poulk mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
L
2024-07-28 · Me.Everitt40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daphne Poulk mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-12 · Me.Everitt40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daphne Poulk mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-15 · Me.Everitt40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daphne Poulk mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-13 · Me.Everitt40M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daphne Poulk mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
L
2024-06-03 · Me.Everitt40M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daphne Poulk mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-07-23 · Am.Merdes18M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daphne Poulk mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-07-16 · Am.Merdes18M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daphne Poulk mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5mixed
40%
4W–6L · 49% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
41%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer