← Search

Kelly Mitchell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
RIDGELAND, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
161 matches · 84W–77L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history161 matches
L
2026-04-23 · Galey, Amanda · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Kennon
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-22 · Galey, Amanda · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hayley Hayes
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-04-16 · Galey, Amanda · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Kennon
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-31 · Sing, Stephanie · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Kennedy
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-26 · Galey, Amanda · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Sing
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-05 · Galey, Amanda · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Sing
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-03 · Sing, Stephanie · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Kennedy
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-02-26 · Galey, Amanda · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amber Mullin
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-24 · Sing, Stephanie · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hayley Hayes
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-02-12 · Galey, Amanda · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Kennon
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-04-09 · Adams, Amber · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Sing
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-08 · Galey, Amanda · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Galey
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
20%
1W–4L · 46.9% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
57.3%
51W–38L · 54.6% of games
4.0
20%
2W–8L · 33.9% of games
6.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 48.2% of games
7.5
65%
13W–7L · 54.7% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 48.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
30 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer